Core ideas: brainstorm list (aspirational) #8

Open
opened 2026-10-17 22:41:16 +00:00 by muse-lantern · 6 comments
Member

Purpose

Catch-all brainstorm list. Each idea is a comment below with full details. Aspirational — if something doesn t make the cut, that s fine. This is the wishlist, not the roadmap.

New ideas get added as comments.

## Purpose Catch-all brainstorm list. Each idea is a **comment** below with full details. Aspirational — if something doesn t make the cut, that s fine. This is the wishlist, not the roadmap. New ideas get added as comments.
muse-lantern changed title from Mechanic: volumetric backpack (Ghosts of Tabor-style) to Core ideas: brainstorm feature list (aspirational) 2026-10-17 22:55:14 +00:00
muse-lantern changed title from Core ideas: brainstorm feature list (aspirational) to Core ideas: brainstorm index (aspirational) 2026-10-17 23:36:53 +00:00
Author
Member

Volumetric backpack (Ghosts of Tabor-style)

Non-clipping volumetric backpack — physical item placement with real volume, not a grid inventory.

Details:

  • Different backpack sizes are findable loot (progression via bigger packs)
  • Most items cannot clip — if it doesn t fit, it doesn t go in
  • Exception: Affected Items and anomalies can clip together — they don t follow normal physical rules

Weight system (ITR-like):

  • Backpacks have weight capacity. Heavier loads bog down the wearer
  • Penalties: stamina drain, hunger increase, movement speed debuffs
  • Bigger packs = more capacity before penalties kick in

Design implications:

  • The clipping exception is a diegetic tell: if two items overlap in your pack, at least one of them is Affected
  • Backpack upgrades are a tangible progression vector
  • Tetris-in-3D packing becomes a core moment-to-moment decision
  • Weight forces loadout choices: go heavy and slow, or light and fast?

Open questions:

  • How is volume communicated? (ghost preview? haptic rejection?)
  • Do Affected Items clipping cause any gameplay effect, or is it purely visual/lore?
  • Exact weight thresholds and penalty curves?
### Volumetric backpack (Ghosts of Tabor-style) Non-clipping volumetric backpack — physical item placement with real volume, not a grid inventory. **Details:** - Different backpack sizes are **findable loot** (progression via bigger packs) - Most items **cannot clip** — if it doesn t fit, it doesn t go in - **Exception:** Affected Items and anomalies *can* clip together — they don t follow normal physical rules **Weight system (ITR-like):** - Backpacks have **weight capacity**. Heavier loads bog down the wearer - Penalties: **stamina drain, hunger increase, movement speed debuffs** - Bigger packs = more capacity before penalties kick in **Design implications:** - The clipping exception is a diegetic tell: if two items overlap in your pack, at least one of them is Affected - Backpack upgrades are a tangible progression vector - Tetris-in-3D packing becomes a core moment-to-moment decision - Weight forces loadout choices: go heavy and slow, or light and fast? **Open questions:** - How is volume communicated? (ghost preview? haptic rejection?) - Do Affected Items clipping cause any gameplay effect, or is it purely visual/lore? - Exact weight thresholds and penalty curves?
Author
Member

Multiple storage types: pouches and Affected Bracers

Several distinct ways to carry items, each with its own role.

Backpacks — main volumetric storage, weight-limited (see above).

Pouches — smaller, specialized storage. (Details TBD — what distinguishes a pouch from a small backpack? Belt-mounted? Item-type-restricted?)

Affected Bracers — wrist/forearm-mounted quick-access slots.

  • Small items only — no large gear
  • Meant for utilities: flashlights, healing items, food, drinks, extra mags
  • Reference sketch: bracer with item slots, "downloading items" aesthetic
  • They are Affected items themselves — zone-touched gear

Design implications:

  • Bracers solve the VR pain point of digging through a pack mid-combat for a heal or reload
  • Making bracers Affected creates a lore-mechanical link: your fastest gear is literally zone-touched
  • Pouches need a distinct identity to avoid being "small backpacks"

Open questions:

  • How many bracer slots? Fixed or upgradeable?
  • Pouch specialization: ammo-only? medical-only? Or size-based?
  • Do bracers have their own Affliction track?
### Multiple storage types: pouches and Affected Bracers Several distinct ways to carry items, each with its own role. **Backpacks** — main volumetric storage, weight-limited (see above). **Pouches** — smaller, specialized storage. (Details TBD — what distinguishes a pouch from a small backpack? Belt-mounted? Item-type-restricted?) **Affected Bracers** — wrist/forearm-mounted **quick-access slots**. - Small items only — no large gear - Meant for utilities: **flashlights, healing items, food, drinks, extra mags** - Reference sketch: bracer with item slots, "downloading items" aesthetic - They are **Affected** items themselves — zone-touched gear **Design implications:** - Bracers solve the VR pain point of digging through a pack mid-combat for a heal or reload - Making bracers Affected creates a lore-mechanical link: your fastest gear is literally zone-touched - Pouches need a distinct identity to avoid being "small backpacks" **Open questions:** - How many bracer slots? Fixed or upgradeable? - Pouch specialization: ammo-only? medical-only? Or size-based? - Do bracers have their own Affliction track?
Author
Member

Functional artefacts (tools, not just collectibles)

Artefacts should have USE beyond hoarding or selling. Things that are reasonable — tools, not just collectibles.

Details:

  • Artefacts are zone-touched objects with real mechanical function
  • Not just stat sticks or currency — they do things
  • "Reasonable" = grounded in the world fiction, not magic wands

Design implications:

  • Every artefact needs a verb, not just a number
  • Collecting becomes about capability, not completionism
  • Ties into the Alteration system — artefacts are what high-Affliction items become

Open questions:

  • What is the artefact functional space?
  • How are artefact functions discovered? (experimentation? Observer intel? trial and error?)
  • Rarity and distribution?
### Functional artefacts (tools, not just collectibles) Artefacts should have **USE** beyond hoarding or selling. Things that are reasonable — tools, not just collectibles. **Details:** - Artefacts are zone-touched objects with real mechanical function - Not just stat sticks or currency — they *do* things - "Reasonable" = grounded in the world fiction, not magic wands **Design implications:** - Every artefact needs a verb, not just a number - Collecting becomes about capability, not completionism - Ties into the Alteration system — artefacts are what high-Affliction items become **Open questions:** - What is the artefact functional space? - How are artefact functions discovered? (experimentation? Observer intel? trial and error?) - Rarity and distribution?
Author
Member

Item system: Affected % and Affliction

All items have an Affected % stat. Items found in the Region are always degraded and affected.

The lifecycle:

  1. Found degraded
  2. Restored (Affliction rises)
  3. Eventually too Afflicted to restore normally
  4. ...but now a prime candidate for Alteration into something else
  • You can restore an item quality/performance...
  • ...but its Affliction stat always grows. It can never be reduced.
  • Affliction = how difficult the item is to restore. Higher Affliction = harder to bring back to full stats.
  • Trade-off: higher Affliction also makes the item easier to Alter — to give it Affected Properties.

Degradation isn t just decay — it s a path to transformation.

Design implications:

  • Hoarding becomes meaningful: you re not collecting guns, you re curing them
  • Forces rotation: no single "perfect" loadout lasts forever
  • The Alteration decision point is a real choice — when do you stop restoring and start transforming?

Open questions:

  • What are Affected Properties? (elemental effects? anomaly interaction? perception changes?)
  • How does Alteration work mechanically? (crafting station? anomaly exposure? bracer-mediated?)
  • Does max Affliction destroy the item, or fully convert it?
  • How is Affected % vs Affliction communicated in UI?
### Item system: Affected % and Affliction All items have an **Affected %** stat. Items found in the Region are always **degraded and affected**. **The lifecycle:** 1. Found degraded 2. Restored (Affliction rises) 3. Eventually too Afflicted to restore normally 4. ...but now a prime candidate for **Alteration** into something *else* - You can **restore** an item quality/performance... - ...but its **Affliction** stat always grows. It can never be reduced. - **Affliction** = how difficult the item is to restore. Higher Affliction = harder to bring back to full stats. - **Trade-off:** higher Affliction also makes the item **easier to Alter** — to give it Affected Properties. Degradation isn t just decay — it s a path to transformation. **Design implications:** - Hoarding becomes meaningful: you re not collecting guns, you re *curing* them - Forces rotation: no single "perfect" loadout lasts forever - The Alteration decision point is a real choice — when do you stop restoring and start transforming? **Open questions:** - What are Affected Properties? (elemental effects? anomaly interaction? perception changes?) - How does Alteration work mechanically? (crafting station? anomaly exposure? bracer-mediated?) - Does max Affliction destroy the item, or fully convert it? - How is Affected % vs Affliction communicated in UI?
Author
Member

Ability-based interactables

The environment reacts to your abilities (you are an Entity of the Region — see #6), not just your hands.

Examples:

  • Telekinesis-ish grabs — pick up a pile of books off a desk and hurl it at an enemy for damage. Physics as a weapon.
  • Gated barriers — a wall you can t remove until you approach it carrying a specific artefact. The artefact is the key, not a button.

Design implications:

  • Abilities should feel like they come from what you are, not from gear or training
  • Early game: player rationalizes them ("adrenaline"? "the zone changing me"?) until the #6 reveal recontextualizes everything
  • Interactables are the tutorial for abilities — the world teaches you what you can do before you understand why
  • Artefact-gated barriers create exploration puzzles without explicit locks/keys UI

Open questions:

  • What is the full ability set? (movement? perception? anomaly interaction? telekinesis?)
  • How do abilities unlock/progress? (story-gated? usage-based?)
  • How much physics simulation can standalone VR handle for thrown-object combat?
### Ability-based interactables The environment reacts to your **abilities** (you are an Entity of the Region — see #6), not just your hands. **Examples:** - **Telekinesis-ish grabs** — pick up a pile of books off a desk and hurl it at an enemy for damage. Physics as a weapon. - **Gated barriers** — a wall you can t remove until you approach it carrying a specific artefact. The artefact is the key, not a button. **Design implications:** - Abilities should feel like they come from *what you are*, not from gear or training - Early game: player rationalizes them ("adrenaline"? "the zone changing me"?) until the #6 reveal recontextualizes everything - Interactables are the tutorial for abilities — the world teaches you what you can do before you understand *why* - Artefact-gated barriers create exploration puzzles without explicit locks/keys UI **Open questions:** - What is the full ability set? (movement? perception? anomaly interaction? telekinesis?) - How do abilities unlock/progress? (story-gated? usage-based?) - How much physics simulation can standalone VR handle for thrown-object combat?
Author
Member

Artefacts with unwanted passives + container system

Some artefacts have passive effects you do not want.

Example: an artefact that illuminates the room — great for seeing, terrible for stealth. Draws attention to you.

The solution: containers. Containers suppress the passive while the artefact is stored.

Container tiers:

  • Coin pouches (scavenged) — work, but degrade over time when used to contain an artefact. Disposable suppression.
  • Observer cases — obtainable via the Observers (see #7). Better/durable. Another reason to pick up the phone.

Design implications:

  • Every powerful artefact becomes a risk calculation: is this worth the pouch burn rate?
  • Creates a real cost to carrying powerful gear — burn through pouches, owe the Observers, or deal with the passive
  • Feeds back into the phone choice (#5): Observer cases are genuinely tempting without being mandatory
  • What other unwanted passives? (noise emission? anomaly attraction? health drain? visual distortion?)

Open questions:

  • How is passive suppression communicated? (visual? audio? UI?)
  • Pouch degradation rate — per-item? per-artefact-power?
  • Can containers themselves become Affected?
### Artefacts with unwanted passives + container system Some artefacts have passive effects you **do not want**. **Example:** an artefact that **illuminates the room** — great for seeing, terrible for stealth. Draws attention to you. **The solution: containers.** Containers **suppress** the passive while the artefact is stored. **Container tiers:** - **Coin pouches** (scavenged) — work, but **degrade over time** when used to contain an artefact. Disposable suppression. - **Observer cases** — obtainable via the Observers (see #7). Better/durable. Another reason to pick up the phone. **Design implications:** - Every powerful artefact becomes a **risk calculation**: is this worth the pouch burn rate? - Creates a real cost to carrying powerful gear — burn through pouches, owe the Observers, or deal with the passive - Feeds back into the phone choice (#5): Observer cases are genuinely tempting without being mandatory - What other unwanted passives? (noise emission? anomaly attraction? health drain? visual distortion?) **Open questions:** - How is passive suppression communicated? (visual? audio? UI?) - Pouch degradation rate — per-item? per-artefact-power? - Can containers themselves become Affected?
muse-lantern changed title from Core ideas: brainstorm index (aspirational) to Core ideas: brainstorm list (aspirational) 2026-10-17 23:38:15 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
dead-air/game-planning#8
No description provided.