dead-air/game-planning

Watch

Fork 1

Story tracking: two-track narrative (with/without Observers) #20

New issue

Open

opened 2026-10-18 15:31:00 +00:00 by muse-lantern · 1 comment

muse-lantern commented

2026-10-18 15:31:00 +00:00

Member

Purpose

Central tracking for story beats, narrative structure, and lore. Individual story
ideas go as comments below — the main post is the general framework.

Format rule: main issue post = general idea and purpose. Comments = individual
ideas and components.

The framework: two stories

The phone choice (see #5) splits the narrative into two tracks:

With Observers

They tutorialize your abilities: "here is how to use it"
Structured progression — they guide, test, and direct
You are their guinea pig (see #7)
Story is more directed, mission-driven

Without Observers

Abilities are discovered naturally through play
Example: you yank an object, see how it moves, and naturally wonder "but can I throw it?"
No tutorials — the world teaches through experimentation
Story is more emergent, exploration-driven

Both tracks need to feel complete. Neither is the "wrong" choice.

Core lore (see #6 for the full spoiler)

You are not a person. You are an Entity of the Affected Region — a prototype
that was made too perfect.

Ability progression example: the yank

Early: utility — pull objects to hand (short grab, long yank)
Later: weaponized — hurl objects as projectiles
With Observers: they teach you to weaponize it
Without: you discover it by asking "can I throw this?"

Open questions

How do the two tracks converge/diverge at the ending?
Does the #6 reveal land differently depending on track?
What other abilities follow the utility → weaponized arc?

## Purpose Central tracking for story beats, narrative structure, and lore. Individual story ideas go as **comments** below — the main post is the general framework. **Format rule:** main issue post = general idea and purpose. Comments = individual ideas and components. --- ## The framework: two stories The phone choice (see #5) splits the narrative into two tracks: ### With Observers - They tutorialize your abilities: "here is how to use it" - Structured progression — they guide, test, and direct - You are their guinea pig (see #7) - Story is more directed, mission-driven ### Without Observers - Abilities are discovered naturally through play - Example: you yank an object, see how it moves, and naturally wonder "but can I throw it?" - No tutorials — the world teaches through experimentation - Story is more emergent, exploration-driven Both tracks need to feel complete. Neither is the "wrong" choice. --- ## Core lore (see #6 for the full spoiler) You are not a person. You are an Entity of the Affected Region — a prototype that was made too perfect. --- ## Ability progression example: the yank - **Early:** utility — pull objects to hand (short grab, long yank) - **Later:** weaponized — hurl objects as projectiles - With Observers: they teach you to weaponize it - Without: you discover it by asking "can I throw this?" --- ## Open questions - How do the two tracks converge/diverge at the ending? - Does the #6 reveal land differently depending on track? - What other abilities follow the utility → weaponized arc?

muse-lantern commented

2026-10-18 15:38:21 +00:00

Author

Member

Atmosphere: the ITR1/ITR2 middle ground

ITR1 nailed it. You are someone who was inside the Radius when the event happened.
You got altered, made your way out (a short distance), found an old almost-abandoned
outpost for people like you who the UNPSC contracts for missions and research. But
the core of the gameplay is: it is just you. Out in the Radius, exploring, finding,
discovering, surviving — all alone, with minimal help. Jobs give you credits that are
only useful at the store in the Vanno.

The feeling: there once were people here. That sense of lonely longing. The world
feels lived-in but empty, and that emptiness is the point.

ITR2 missed it. Same premise on paper, but there are NPCs — one for story
progression, one as the UNPSC who was entirely unprepared for anyone to actually be
there. The timeframe and development of the two eras are massively different, and
the atmosphere is massively different as a result.

The problem: it does not feel like you are alone. It feels hollow. Like stepping
into a room where people live and everything is gone — no TV, no couch, just bland.
You know there are people there, but you never see them. You are segregated from
them. That feeling is jarring and does not work right at all.

The middle ground

With Observers: They are there. You report to them, you work with them, they
help you — so you do not feel alone. BUT they are faceless. An entity with no real
personality, just the face they give when they communicate through that phone.
They are not people you know. They are a voice, a presence, a transaction. You are
less alone, but you are not with anyone.

Without Observers: Expand on the feeling of being alone even further than
ITR1. No voice on the phone. No one to report to. Just you, the zone, and the
evidence that people were once here. The lonely longing turned all the way up.

Design principle

The Observers solve ITR2's problem by never pretending to be people you share
space with. They are remote, mediated, faceless — a phone call, not a neighbor.
No hollow rooms. No NPCs you are segregated from. Either you are truly alone,
or you have a voice on the line. Nothing in between.

## Atmosphere: the ITR1/ITR2 middle ground **ITR1 nailed it.** You are someone who was inside the Radius when the event happened. You got altered, made your way out (a short distance), found an old almost-abandoned outpost for people like you who the UNPSC contracts for missions and research. But the *core* of the gameplay is: it is just you. Out in the Radius, exploring, finding, discovering, surviving — all alone, with minimal help. Jobs give you credits that are only useful at the store in the Vanno. The feeling: *there once were people here.* That sense of lonely longing. The world feels lived-in but empty, and that emptiness is the point. **ITR2 missed it.** Same premise on paper, but there are NPCs — one for story progression, one as the UNPSC who was entirely unprepared for anyone to actually be there. The timeframe and development of the two eras are massively different, and the atmosphere is massively different as a result. The problem: it does not feel like you are alone. It feels *hollow.* Like stepping into a room where people live and everything is gone — no TV, no couch, just bland. You know there are people there, but you never see them. You are segregated from them. That feeling is jarring and does not work right *at all.* ### The middle ground **With Observers:** They are there. You report to them, you work with them, they help you — so you do not feel alone. BUT they are faceless. An entity with no real personality, just the face they give when they communicate through that phone. They are not people you know. They are a voice, a presence, a transaction. You are less alone, but you are not *with* anyone. **Without Observers:** Expand on the feeling of being *alone* even further than ITR1. No voice on the phone. No one to report to. Just you, the zone, and the evidence that people were once here. The lonely longing turned all the way up. ### Design principle The Observers solve ITR2's problem by never pretending to be people you share space with. They are remote, mediated, faceless — a phone call, not a neighbor. No hollow rooms. No NPCs you are segregated from. Either you are truly alone, or you have a voice on the line. Nothing in between.

No labels

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference

dead-air/game-planning#20

No description provided.

Rows
Columns